The six-part review framework
Every profile is assessed against the same framework. Information quality and player protection carry more weight than visual polish or the size of a promotion.
| Area | Weight | What we inspect |
|---|---|---|
| Terms transparency | 25% | Wagering, max bet, expiry, exclusions |
| Payments | 20% | Deposit and withdrawal limits, fees, KYC |
| Legal & consumer risk | 20% | Australian status, regulator records, recourse |
| Track record | 15% | Operator identity, history, material disputes |
| Support | 10% | Channels, hours, escalation information |
| Usability | 10% | Mobile clarity, navigation, accessibility |
Research and update process
We check operator terms, payment pages and promotion rules, then compare material legal claims with primary regulator guidance. A review date is shown on every page. Claims that cannot be confirmed are labelled “reported” rather than presented as settled fact.
Commercial independence
Rankings follow our published methodology. Casino links may contain partner tracking, but commercial relationships do not purchase a higher score. Any paid relationship is disclosed beside the relevant link and in the editorial policy.
Corrections
Material errors are corrected in the page copy and reassessed at the next review. Readers can use the contact details published on the About page to flag a factual issue.